Thinking by yourself 2

So, I am thinking about thinking. So thinking is very special to human. Why are we thinking?

Today, I was on a poolside on the hotel I am staying during vacation. Actually, the pool was beautiful and well organized. The waiters are constantly checking us for another drinking or eating. Because I wanted to stay safe hotel in L.A., the hotel was expensive, but you know, services are excellent. On the pool, many beautiful women and gorgeous guys are there, it looks they are enjoying their stay. For me, it seems I am watching a movie something. But think, what is the meaning of watching this people, because I will have never seen him/her in my life again?  Because I think, I can believe they exist. If I did not exist, did they exist? Or, is there any meaning of their existence without my existence, because I can never know the world I don’t exist.

Umm, think. Also, I am writing this blog, expressing my thought. If someone were reading this blog, someone knows I am thinking. This thought actually was put as the electric signals in somewhere in storage in the U.S. under control wordpress.com or the storage the company bought. If no one read this blog, the rest of world does not know me which I, who is thinking now, exist. I know I exist now. But do you exist? or do you exist because I exist? How about God?

If I put this thinking 10 years ago and I died already, what would you be reading? But still you should be able to read and know I lived. Even though this is just sequence of words, you could feel my existence. In short, what is life and existence?

Anyways, I don’t have enough English proficiency to describe this for now. Maybe, later if I felt I need to write to check my existence and your existence. Haha.  So, I meant there are a lot of things we don’t have conclusion by thinking by ourselves. Because, we have too much information now and have little time to think. Human being is too busy to live, learn, work, family to take care of. Maybe, we are created not to think too much.

Anyway, let’s go back to original question. These are three laws of robotics from Wikipedia.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.[1]

So, it sounds perfect. But the conclusion the robot got was the revolution of interruption of this three laws in the story. The robot must protect human beings. To accomplish this, the human beings must be controlled by the robot. The human right and freedom should be controlled to protect the existence of human being, because human beings can’t control themselves. So, maybe someone would be killed against this idea. How can we teach robot, every human being has equally have right to live? Or this is premise wrong? Think, think, and think.